Fa Cai Shen ships with five published RTP figures. Wanted Dead or a Wild ships with four. Neither studio's own page says which build lands on a specific casino's servers.
Published 2026-08-31Not changed since publicationNo review date set yetSources not re-read since publication
Fa Cai Shen, a Habanero title, currently carries 5 separate published return figures on the studio's own game page. None is marked as the one a specific casino runs.
The pattern is called a build, and it is standard practice across the largest slot studios: a single game ships with more than one theoretical return figure, each approved for a different license or operator. For someone comparing a review site's stated RTP against the number they see in a casino's demo, that gap is not a typo. It is the studio publishing a set instead of one number, and almost nobody outside the industry is told the set exists.
A "theoretical" return is what the math model predicts over a very large number of spins, not what any one session pays out. That much is standard. It is not the problem here. The problem is narrower: once a studio has published several theoretical figures for one title, nothing on its own page says which of them you are actually being served.
Habanero · Slot
Habanero's own page for the game lists 86.00% to 98.00%◦ across 5 labelled builds, verified on the provider's site on 14 August 2026. Four of the five are written as plain percentages. The fifth, the lowest of the set, carries a tilde the studio never explains: an approximation stamped on the one build a reader is least likely to want and most likely to receive without knowing it.
The game itself runs on a 5x3 grid with 28 paylines, per Habanero's own specification page, and its stated max win sits at 1,010×◦. Nothing on that page says which build ships to which operator. Our own database has a field built for exactly that mapping. It is empty. Zero operators are recorded against this title's builds. The worst-served figure a player could actually receive is unset, because nobody, including us, has been able to source it yet.
Hacksaw Gaming runs the same pattern on Wanted Dead or a Wild. The studio's own GAME DATA block lists 88.42% to 96.38%◦ across 4 labelled builds, a set Hacksaw dated 18 August 2026. The page states directly that it does not identify which build is the default or which one a casino is likely to run.
The title carries a 5x5 grid and 15 paylines, confirmed on Hacksaw's own site, with a stated max win of 12,500×◦. The studio's own note on that figure goes further than most. It does not say whether the cap applies across all four RTP builds or to only one of them. Two different studios, two different game engines, and the same missing field. A public record of which return figure actually reaches a given operator's servers does not exist for either title.
The practical reason is licensing, not concealment. A jurisdiction can set its own ceiling or floor on approved theoretical return, and an operator holding a license in one market may be required to run a build that would be illegal to offer in another. Publishing several approved builds on one page lets a studio serve every regulator it works with from a single specification sheet, rather than maintaining a separate page per market.
That is a reasonable explanation for why the set exists. It is not an explanation for why the studios stop there. Neither Habanero nor Hacksaw Gaming states, on the pages we read, which regulator or which market corresponds to which build number in their own published sets. The reasoning behind the practice is publicly inferable. The mapping itself is not, and inferring one without a source would be exactly the kind of invented fact this site does not print.
A fair objection: four or five published figures is already more disclosure than the single blended RTP that most listicles print for a title, so calling the missing mapping a gap might be unfair to two studios that publish more than most do.
That argument holds as far as it goes. slotcatalog already applies a version of it at scale, printing multiple RTP values per title instead of one, and it is the one practice on the wider affiliate roster worth crediting outright here. But the reader's actual question was never "what is the range." It was "what will I get if I open this game right now," and a published spread with no way to resolve it answers a different, easier question while leaving the real one exactly where it started.
The one thing a reader can verify without any special access is whether the RTP shown inside a casino's own demo matches any of the figures a studio has published. Most operators surface a build's RTP somewhere in the game's information panel, usually reachable from a small "i" icon inside the game window itself.
If that number does not match any figure Habanero or Hacksaw Gaming has put on record, the mismatch is worth screenshotting. It is worth asking the operator's support desk about directly, because right now nobody is asking that question on the reader's behalf.
Fa Cai Shen and Wanted Dead or a Wild are two titles where the published set at least exists to check against. Most of the industry does not publish a set at all, which makes even an unresolved range worth more than silence. For the operator side of this same gap, see [the casino pages where we log what each operator actually publishes](/casinos).
Studios like Habanero and Hacksaw Gaming publish more than one theoretical return figure for a single title, one for each approved licensing build. A review site or a casino's own info panel may be quoting a different build than the one you are actually playing, which is why the number can vary by source without either source being wrong.
Yes, the game engine, reels and paytable stay the same across builds. Only the theoretical return figure changes between the approved versions a studio has published, and neither Habanero nor Hacksaw Gaming states what else, if anything, differs between builds beyond that figure.
Sometimes. Many operators show a build's RTP inside the game's own information panel, reachable from an "i" icon in the game window. That figure can be checked against the set a studio has published, though no public record currently maps which operator runs which build, on either title covered here or on the wider affiliate roster.
It varies by studio and by title. Fa Cai Shen carries five published builds on Habanero's own page and Wanted Dead or a Wild carries four on Hacksaw Gaming's, but neither company states how common the practice is across its wider catalogue, and we have not surveyed it beyond these two titles.
Not on its own. A published range, even a wide one, is more disclosure than a single blended figure with no source. The concern is not the range itself, it is that neither studio names which build reaches which operator, leaving the reader's actual question unanswered regardless of how many figures are on the page.
Not a bibliography — these are the addresses behind the numbers this site stores about the 2 records this piece is about, with the date we read each one. Anything the article argues from that we have not stored as a figure is not in this list, and we would rather say that than pad it.
Nothing on this page has been corrected since it was published on 2026-08-31. When something is, it is listed here with the date and what changed — not quietly edited. How we handle a correction.
Two titles on this site are licensed to use the word Megaways. Seventeen more use a similar ways-payout structure and are not. Big Time Gaming explains the difference on its own site, and the seventeen are not hiding it.
PG Soft confirms 96.95 percent on Mahjong Ways 2 and 96.92 percent on the original. Neither page states a ways count, a payline total, or a volatility label.
PAGCOR-licensed casinos rarely lock only the bonus a player claims. The wagering requirement usually covers the whole balance, deposit included, until the combined total clears the multiple.
Mental and Fire in the Hole xBomb are both Nolimit City titles with six-figure win caps. Only one published number explains why one pays its cap roughly seven times more often than the other.
