Gates of Olympus POP and Eastern Fury both launched inside one week from Pragmatic Play's own newsroom, and each carries exactly one figure: a flat return, nothing else.
Published 2026-09-06Not changed since publicationNo review date set yetSources not re-read since publication
Pragmatic Play put two new slots into its own newsroom eight days apart: Eastern Fury on 27 August 2026, and Gates of Olympus POP on 31 August, the third entry in its most valuable slot franchise. Each one launched with one figure on its studio page. A flat return, no supporting detail.
That is the whole spec sheet a launch gets from the only source that actually built the game. A hit frequency or a volatility label requires running simulations against the exact math model that shipped, and neither Pragmatic Play page states either figure for its newest title. Anyone hunting a fuller picture in launch week has two options. An honest gap, or a number nobody could have measured yet.
Eastern Fury is a 5x5 slot built around expanding wilds that turn sticky and multipliers running from 2x to 100x. Its studio page lists a return to player of 96.53 percent. It is unqualified, under a heading the studio labels Basic Game Info. Gates of Olympus POP shrinks the tumbling-reels format the studio built its reputation on into a compact 3x5 grid aimed at mobile play, and its page lists 96.54% in the same format, accessed on 6 September 2026.
Both figures sit in the same format this site's own record already shows for the rest of the franchise: 96.50%◦ for the 2021 original, verified on 14 August 2026, and 96.50%◦ for the 2023 sequel, verified on 18 August, whose own basis note flags that the studio never says whether its number covers the version with a bought bonus round switched on. Four titles, one franchise, four times the same one-line disclosure, and no hit frequency, bonus frequency or maximum-win probability published for any of them.
Gates of Olympus POP is not the first title in this line to publish one number and nothing beside it. The original did the same in 2021. So did the 2023 sequel.
Both of those configs land within four hundredths of a point of the new title's 96.54%. If the POP edition's figure holds up the same way, three titles built across four years from the same studio will have published within half a point of each other, which says more about a fixed target the developer designs toward than it does about any one of the individual games.
One third-party review site, AboutSlots, carries a full data table for Gates of Olympus POP: a return of 97.05%, a hit frequency of 28.82%, a volatility label of Medium, and a bonus round striking on average once every 221.58 spins. The review is dated 13 July 2026 and marked last edited a day later. Pragmatic Play's own newsroom did not carry the game until 31 August, forty-nine days after that review went live.
A hit frequency and a bonus frequency are not guesses. Producing them means running the exact math model that ships, millions of simulated spins deep, against the finished build. A page describing that build seven weeks before the studio itself announced it is describing something, but it is not describing the game Pragmatic Play released on 31 August. And the 97.05% return it lists sits half a point above the 96.54% the studio's own page states for the same title.
Studios do sometimes hand certified affiliates and testing labs a finished build under embargo, so an early number is not automatically invented. If AboutSlots had genuine advance access, its figures would describe something real, just ahead of the public release date.
What that explanation cannot cover is the mismatch itself. An early build measured correctly would return the same 96.54% the studio published on release day, not 97.05%. Two numbers describing one game a half point apart cannot both be measurements of what actually shipped. Neither can they both be right.
Right now, the studio's own figure is the more trustworthy of the two, not because 96.54% is certain to be exact, but because it carries the only date and source that actually match the game as shipped. Treat any hit frequency, volatility label or bonus-round frequency published for a title still inside its first month as unconfirmed, however specific it looks.
This site tracks the same problem from the other direction, on [the newest casinos on our record](/casinos/new). An entry shows up there before its own history is long enough to say much about it, and the honest position is to say so rather than backfill confidence it has not earned yet. Gates of Olympus POP and Eastern Fury will likely gain fuller data sets eventually, the way the original and its 1000 sequel already have. Until then, the studio's one line is worth more than anyone else's whole table.
Pragmatic Play's own page states 96.54%, accessed 6 September 2026, with no note on bet size or bonus-buy status. A different figure, 97.05%, appears on a third-party review site dated weeks before the game's actual release, and the two cannot both describe the shipped build.
Yes. Pragmatic Play's own game page lists a return of 96.53 percent under Basic Game Info, the same unqualified format the studio uses across its catalog. No hit frequency or volatility label accompanies it.
Those figures require simulating the exact math model that ships across millions of spins, work that can only start once a build is finished. A studio's day-one page carries a single theoretical return; a fuller spec sheet, when a studio publishes one at all, tends to arrive later or not at all.
It can, if the studio hands a finished build to a certified partner under embargo. But an early figure should then match the studio's eventual published number. When AboutSlots's 97.05% RTP for Gates of Olympus POP differs from Pragmatic Play's own 96.54%, that gap is the detail worth noticing, not the early date by itself.
The original 2021 title and the 2023 sequel, Gates of Olympus 1000, both list a return of 96.50 percent on the studio's own pages, each verified independently. The new POP edition's 96.54% sits close to that figure but is not identical to it.
Not a bibliography — these are the addresses behind the numbers this site stores about the 2 records this piece is about, with the date we read each one. Anything the article argues from that we have not stored as a figure is not in this list, and we would rather say that than pad it.
Nothing on this page has been corrected since it was published on 2026-09-06. When something is, it is listed here with the date and what changed — not quietly edited. How we handle a correction.
Death Dominion, Harvest Moon: Grave Profits and The Dog House Megaways 1000 share almost no mechanics. Each one's own page still states a 1,000x multiplier ceiling and a return in the same mid-90s band.
Two titles on this site are licensed to use the word Megaways. Seventeen more use a similar ways-payout structure and are not. Big Time Gaming explains the difference on its own site, and the seventeen are not hiding it.
A wagering requirement times a house edge gives a real cost in pesos or dollars. The build that sets that edge is stored on this site for dozens of slots, and most bonus terms never name it.
PG Soft confirms 96.95 percent on Mahjong Ways 2 and 96.92 percent on the original. Neither page states a ways count, a payline total, or a volatility label.
