Four PAGCOR-licensed brands in this database confirm the same licence class through PAGCOR's own lists. None of the four numbers is published anywhere, PAGCOR's or otherwise.
Published 2026-08-20Not changed since publicationNo review date set yetSources not re-read since publication
This piece is about Philippines and is written for readers there. Rules, ages and licence classes differ by country and nothing here transfers to another one.
Rajabets carries a licence number PAGCOR has never published for anyone: ALSI-202509014-FI1, issued 16 September 2025 and set to expire twelve months later, verified against Anjouan Gaming Authority's own public register on 14 August 2026.
Anjouan's register works differently from PAGCOR's. A reader appends the number to a URL query string and reads the case back from a data table, rather than paging through PDFs. That table is written by the page's own script from a data payload embedded in the document, so a check that only reads the raw page finds an empty register even though the number resolves in a real browser. The company behind Rajabets, on that register, is named as 3-102-936502 SRL. The domains on file are reybets.com and rajabets.com.
None of that makes Rajabets a Philippine casino. It holds no PAGCOR licence, PIGO or otherwise, and it does not appear on this project's Philippine market matrix at all, under any licence class. A number that resolves cleanly on a foreign regulator's register answers a foreign regulator's question. It does not answer the one a reader in the Philippines is actually asking.
Eaglebet99 held an Anjouan number too, ALSI-202605046-FI2, until the Anjouan register moved it to a separate page: Enforcement, Revoked Licences. The entry there names the holding company, Amor 25 Limited, states the status as revoked, dates the action to 10 July 2026, and gives a reason: illegal sublicensing.
That is the case for a specific number over a class with none. A revocation with a stated reason is something a reader can act on immediately: stop, and know why. PAGCOR's three PDFs have no equivalent page. A brand simply stops appearing on the next republished list, with no reason attached to the removal, and this project has no record of any of the four PIGO brands ever being removed that way.
The obvious response to everything above is that Anjouan's system sounds more transparent than PAGCOR's: a searchable number, a dated revocation with a reason, against three static PDFs with none of that. On the page, that is true.
Across the twenty-five affiliate sites already read for this project's own research, only two print a licence number at all on a casino review; the rest print an unlinked word such as Curacao, or nothing. A reader trained by that roster to treat any number as unusual will read Rajabets as more forthcoming than OKBet, simply because a number is rarer than a class.
It is also beside the point for a reader in the Philippines. Anjouan Gaming Authority does not license anyone to accept Philippine players. Its number tells a reader that a company is registered with a small offshore regulator, nothing about whether that company may lawfully take a bet from someone in Manila.
Neither Eaglebet99 nor Rajabets holds a PAGCOR licence of any class, domestic or IGL, which means neither is authorised under Philippine law regardless of how specific its Anjouan number looks. A checkable number from the wrong regulator is not a safer signal than an unnumbered class from the right one.
Class first, not number. PIGO means domestic, PAGCOR-issued, and tied to a retail footprint. PAGCOR's other current online class, IGL, replaces the abolished POGO designation and covers offshore-facing operators PAGCOR does not authorise to serve Filipino players. A brand that will not say which of the two it holds, or names neither, has already told a reader something.
Regulator second. A number only means something once a reader knows which authority issued it and whether that authority has any standing over the Philippines at all. Anjouan Gaming Authority does not. PAGCOR does, and PAGCOR is the only one of the two whose class actually authorises a brand to take a bet from Manila.
The two registers reward different habits. PAGCOR rewards patience: three PDFs, cross-referenced by brand and domain, no search box, no number to paste in. Anjouan rewards a single query-string lookup against a table a script writes into the page, plus a separate enforcement page for anything revoked. Neither habit substitutes for the other, and a brand cannot borrow legitimacy from one register by publishing a number that only the other kind of check would have caught as belonging to it.
PAGCOR could close its own gap by putting a number beside each of the four PIGO brands the way Anjouan does for its own licensees. Until it does, the class is the checkable fact, and BingoPlus, 747, Ninogaming and OKBet are the only four brands in this database that carry it.
PAGCOR currently issues two classes for online operators: PIGO, which is domestic, PAGCOR-issued, and tied to a Philippine retail footprint, and IGL, which replaces the abolished POGO designation and covers offshore-facing operators PAGCOR does not authorise to serve Filipino players. A brand serving Filipino players needs the PIGO class, not IGL and not a licence from an unrelated foreign regulator.
Not in the three documents this project checked. PAGCOR's licensee list, accredited-brand list and registered-domain list each name the brand, the company or the domain, but none of the three prints a number a reader could check on sight. That absence held across four brands verified on two separate dates in August 2026.
No. Anjouan Gaming Authority is a Comoros-based offshore regulator with no authority over the Philippine market. Rajabets and Eaglebet99 both carry Anjouan numbers and neither holds a PAGCOR licence of any class, which means neither is authorised to accept Philippine players regardless of how specific its Anjouan number looks.
PAGCOR's public documents name brands, companies and domains rather than licence numbers, so the check runs on the brand name and the domain a reader is actually asked to use, not on a number. This project's separate reporting on PAGCOR's own domain list covers that mechanism in full.
On Anjouan's register, a revoked licence moves to a separate Enforcement page that names the holding company, states the revocation date, and gives a reason. Eaglebet99's entry there names Amor 25 Limited, dates the action to 10 July 2026, and states the reason as illegal sublicensing.
Not a bibliography — these are the addresses behind the numbers this site stores about the 4 records this piece is about, with the date we read each one. Anything the article argues from that we have not stored as a figure is not in this list, and we would rather say that than pad it.
Nothing on this page has been corrected since it was published on 2026-08-20. When something is, it is listed here with the date and what changed — not quietly edited. How we handle a correction.
Two titles on this site are licensed to use the word Megaways. Seventeen more use a similar ways-payout structure and are not. Big Time Gaming explains the difference on its own site, and the seventeen are not hiding it.
PG Soft confirms 96.95 percent on Mahjong Ways 2 and 96.92 percent on the original. Neither page states a ways count, a payline total, or a volatility label.
PAGCOR-licensed casinos rarely lock only the bonus a player claims. The wagering requirement usually covers the whole balance, deposit included, until the combined total clears the multiple.
Mental and Fire in the Hole xBomb are both Nolimit City titles with six-figure win caps. Only one published number explains why one pays its cap roughly seven times more often than the other.