Two of PG Soft's own game-information sheets name a selectable range of RTP builds. Four others state flatly that no such range exists for that title. TopSlotsAsia checked all thirty-two titles it has published from this studio.
Published 2026-09-16Not changed since publicationNo review date set yetSources not re-read since publication
PG Soft's game information sheet for Kraken Gold Rush, read on 2026-09-16, states the game's theoretical return to player as 96.75 percent. The same sheet's summary chart lists six more selectable builds beside it: 94, 95, 97, 98, 99 and 100 percent, seven figures in total for one title. 96.75%◦
Only the 96.75 percent build gets the full treatment. Main game and free spins split, hit rate, feature detail, all present. The other six numbers sit in the same chart with none of that detail attached to them.
Nothing about that is hidden. It sits in the same PDF, two pages further down from the headline figure.
The practical question underneath this is not academic. If an operator can choose among seven certified builds, and only one of the seven carries the studio's own hit-rate and volatility detail, a player has no way to know from anything PG Soft publishes which of the seven a specific casino actually runs. The theoretical ceiling printed on this site describes the build PG Soft documented most fully, not necessarily the build live at any one operator.
Most review pages still print a studio's RTP as a fixed constant, one number per title, with no mention of a range at all. Kraken Gold Rush's own sheet says otherwise, in writing, on PG Soft's own domain, and it took reading the full document rather than the summary line to find it.
Mayan Destiny's own game information sheet, checked the same day, tells the same story. Its summary chart runs from 94 to 100 percent, and only the 96.74 percent build carries the full main game and bonus split PG Soft is prepared to document in full. 96.74%◦
Two titles, read on the same day, both show a studio naming more builds than it fully documents for a reader. That is not what the rest of PG Soft's catalogue on this site says, at least not the four titles checked closely enough to say either way.
Bali Vacation's sheet states plainly that no operator-configurable range exists for that game, and names no alternative build anywhere on the page. 96.71%◦ Fortune Mouse and Mahjong Ways each carry close to the same line: the page names no second build and no range for either title. 96.96%◦ 96.92%◦
Songkran Splash goes one step further. Its sheet splits a single 96.69 percent figure into a 69.39 percent main game share and a 27.30 percent free spins share, and still names no second build anywhere on the page. 96.69%◦ Four titles, one shared answer, no ambiguity in any of the four.
None of the four is an older or a smaller title than the two that show a range. Fortune Mouse and Mahjong Ways both sit among PG Soft's better known releases, which rules out the easy guess that only minor titles get the fuller documentation.
The obvious explanation is document type: the two titles with a stated range came from PG Soft's downloadable game information sheet, and the four without came from a lighter web page. That explanation does not survive a check.
Bali Vacation and Songkran Splash were also read from the identical PDF format as Kraken Gold Rush and Mayan Destiny, verified on 2026-09-15 and 2026-08-19. Neither one names a range. Only Fortune Mouse and Mahjong Ways came from PG Soft's lighter web page rather than the PDF, and grouping them with the other two "no range" titles was never more than a guess.
So the honest position is narrower than either a policy claim or a document-format explanation. Two of six checked titles show a range. Four do not. Nothing read so far explains the split, and that is an uncomfortable answer for a site built on stored figures.
The objection deserves stating plainly. Two titles out of thirty-two is a small sample to build a claim on. It is. But the claim under test here was never that PG Soft usually ships one build. It was the stronger claim that a PG Soft RTP is the same everywhere, and that only needs one documented range to fail. It has failed twice, on two of the four titles read from PG Soft's most detailed document.
Twenty-six of PG Soft's thirty-two titles on this site carry no explicit statement either way. Not confirmed single-figure. Not confirmed to carry a range. The question this piece answers for six titles has simply not been put to the rest, because earlier sessions read whichever PG Soft document loaded first and stopped once one clean figure came back.
That gap closes the normal way this site closes any gap: one title at a time, at the next verification pass, checking the downloadable sheet before the web page rather than after it. [The casino pages this site keeps](/casinos) work on the same principle for operators rather than titles: a field that has not been checked is left blank, not filled in from whatever number is easiest to find.
The next PG Soft title added to this catalogue will be checked against its game information sheet first. If a seventh build turns up on a title this site currently marks as single-figure, the record changes that day, not at some scheduled refresh months away.
A reader who wants to know which of these two groups a specific title belongs to right now has one honest option: open that title's page here and read what the verification note actually says, rather than assume either answer from the studio's name alone.
Not confirmed, and for two titles checked closely, probably not. Kraken Gold Rush and Mayan Destiny's own game information sheets each name a range of selectable builds running from 94 to 100 percent, with only one build fully documented per title. Which build a specific casino runs is not stated anywhere PG Soft publishes.
Because that is the only build PG Soft's own document names in enough detail to publish, or because the title's document has not yet been checked for a wider range. Both reasons produce the same single number on the page, and telling them apart is what this article does for six of PG Soft's thirty-two titles here.
It is one of several certified return-to-player configurations a studio makes available, letting different operators run the same game at different theoretical ceilings. A player comparing the RTP printed on a review page against what their own casino actually runs is comparing two numbers that may not be the same one.
Not from anything checked for this piece. Neither PG Soft's game information sheet nor the provider pages read for this article states which of several certified builds a given casino has deployed.
Yes, per title rather than across the catalogue at once. Each PG Soft slot on this site carries its own verification date, and a title moves from single-figure to range-documented the day someone reads its sheet again, not sooner.
Not a bibliography — these are the addresses behind the numbers this site stores about the 6 records this piece is about, with the date we read each one. Anything the article argues from that we have not stored as a figure is not in this list, and we would rather say that than pad it.
Nothing on this page has been corrected since it was published on 2026-09-16. When something is, it is listed here with the date and what changed — not quietly edited. How we handle a correction.
A wagering requirement times a house edge gives a real cost in pesos or dollars. The build that sets that edge is stored on this site for dozens of slots, and most bonus terms never name it.
Two of the seven brands this site tracks were checked this week for a no-deposit bonus's wagering terms. Neither page would open cleanly.
MelBet's own terms cap wagering-period stakes at €5, and a separate clause names bets over that figure as evidence of bonus abuse.
We graded 16 studios on what they publish before reading most of their pages. Two of the first five we actually read contradict the grade, in opposite directions.